DataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners vs Blackstone
← Back to firms

Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners vs Blackstone

A side-by-side comparison of Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners and Blackstone across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Copenhagen Infrastructure PartnersEUR 43B
Blackstone$1.3T
Insight

Blackstone manages roughly 30.2× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Private Credit
Real Estate
Left bar: Copenhagen Infrastructure PartnersRight bar: Blackstone
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Blackstone is the largest by AUM at $1.3T — 30.23× Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners ($43B).
  • • Blackstone is the most established (founded 1985), 27 years before Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (2012).
  • • Blackstone has the broadest mandate — active across 5 asset classes vs 2 for Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Credit, Infrastructure.
  • • Blackstone is the only one here in Private Equity & Real Estate, +1 more.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: Denmark, United States.
  • • Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners's network is more connected (67/100 vs 60/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Overall similarity is 21%, driven by 2 shared asset classes, 38% geo overlap, adjacent AUM band.
21%Similarity score2 shared asset classes · 38% geo overlap · adjacent AUM band
Copenhagen Infrastructure PartnersBlackstone
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryDenmarkUnited States
Founded20121985
Firm age14 yrs41 yrs
RolesGp, LenderGp
Scale & AUM
AUMEUR 43B$1.3T
Market positionLarge ($20–100B)Mega ($500B+)
AUM ratio30.2× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleinfrastructure-focusedMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies12 — Greenfield, Energy / Power, Renewables, Battery Storage / Grid
Asset classesprivate credit, infrastructureprivate equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure
Shared asset classes2: private credit, infrastructure
Geography
Geographic biasNorth AmericaNorth America
RegionsNorth America, Europe, Asia, North AmericaNorth America, Europe, Asia, India
Shared geographiesNorth America, Europe, Asia
Fund Portfolio
Published funds105
Largest fundCopenhagen Infrastructure VBlackstone Capital Partners IX (BCP IX)
Vintage range2018–20262023–2026
Fund statusesClosed (8), Fundraising (2)Fundraising (4), Closed (1)
Team
Total contacts1616
Team-to-AUM ratio0.4 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity67/10060/100
Network strength42/10048/100
Relationships2622
Relationship densityHighHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity21%
Asset class overlap40%
Geography overlap38%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners and Blackstone?

Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners is a asset manager based in Denmark, while Blackstone is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners or Blackstone?

By reported AUM, Blackstone is larger (EUR 43B vs $1.3T).

Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners profile →Blackstone profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in DenmarkMarket intelligenceLatest news