DataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners vs Apollo Global Management
← Back to firms

Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners vs Apollo Global Management

A side-by-side comparison of Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners and Apollo Global Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Copenhagen Infrastructure PartnersEUR 43B
Apollo Global Management$750B
Insight

Apollo Global Management manages roughly 17.4× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Private Credit
Real Estate
Left bar: Copenhagen Infrastructure PartnersRight bar: Apollo Global Management
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Apollo Global Management is the largest by AUM at $750B — 17.44× Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners ($43B).
  • • Apollo Global Management is the most established (founded 1990), 22 years before Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (2012).
  • • Apollo Global Management has the broadest mandate — active across 3 asset classes vs 2 for Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Credit.
  • • Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners is the only one here in Infrastructure.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: Denmark, United States.
  • • Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners's network is more connected (67/100 vs 41/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Overall similarity is 15%, driven by 1 shared asset classes, adjacent AUM band.
15%Similarity score1 shared asset classes · adjacent AUM band
Copenhagen Infrastructure PartnersApollo Global Management
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryDenmarkUnited States
Founded20121990
Firm age14 yrs36 yrs
RolesGp, LenderGp
Scale & AUM
AUMEUR 43B$750B
Market positionLarge ($20–100B)Mega ($500B+)
AUM ratio17.4× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleinfrastructure-focusedMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadDiversified
Strategies12 — Greenfield, Energy / Power, Renewables, Battery Storage / Grid
Asset classesprivate credit, infrastructureprivate equity, private credit, real estate
Shared asset classes1: private credit
Geography
Geographic biasNorth AmericaNorth America
RegionsNorth America, Europe, Asia, North AmericaNorth America, Europe, Asia, India
Shared geographiesNorth America, Europe, Asia
Fund Portfolio
Published funds100
Largest fundCopenhagen Infrastructure V—
Vintage range2018–2026—
Fund statusesClosed (8), Fundraising (2)—
Team
Total contacts1610
Team-to-AUM ratio0.4 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity67/10041/100
Network strength42/10013/100
Relationships266
Relationship densityHighModerate
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity15%
Asset class overlap25%
Geography overlap19%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners and Apollo Global Management?

Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners is a asset manager based in Denmark, while Apollo Global Management is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners or Apollo Global Management?

By reported AUM, Apollo Global Management is larger (EUR 43B vs $750B).

Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners profile →Apollo Global Management profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in DenmarkMarket intelligenceLatest news