DataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Border to Coast Pensions Partnership vs Australian Retirement Trust
← Back to firms

Border to Coast Pensions Partnership vs Australian Retirement Trust

A side-by-side comparison of Border to Coast Pensions Partnership and Australian Retirement Trust across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Border to Coast Pensions PartnershipGBP 55.4B
Australian Retirement TrustAUD 363.64B
Insight

Australian Retirement Trust manages roughly 6.6× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Private Credit
Real Estate
Infrastructure
Fixed Income
Left bar: Border to Coast Pensions PartnershipRight bar: Australian Retirement Trust
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Australian Retirement Trust is the largest by AUM at $363.64B — 6.56× Border to Coast Pensions Partnership ($55.4B).
  • • Australian Retirement Trust has the broadest mandate — active across 6 asset classes vs 5 for Border to Coast Pensions Partnership.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Private Credit, Real Estate, +1 more.
  • • Border to Coast Pensions Partnership is the only one here in Fixed Income.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United Kingdom, Australia.
  • • Border to Coast Pensions Partnership's network is more connected (69/100 vs 66/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Overall similarity is 38%, driven by 4 shared asset classes, 100% geo overlap, same AUM band.
38%Similarity score4 shared asset classes · 100% geo overlap · same AUM band
Border to Coast Pensions PartnershipAustralian Retirement Trust
Basics
Firm typePublic Pension FundPublic Pension Fund
CountryUnited KingdomAustralia
Founded20182022
Firm age8 yrs4 yrs
RolesLpLp
Scale & AUM
AUMGBP 55.4BAUD 363.64B
Market positionLarge ($20–100B)Giant ($100–500B)
AUM ratio6.6× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Asset classesprivate equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, fixed incomeprivate equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, venture capital
Shared asset classes4: private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure
Geography
Geographic biasEuropeGlobal
RegionsNorth America, Europe, Asia, GlobalNorth America, Europe, Asia, Global
Shared geographiesNorth America, Europe, Asia
Team
Total contacts108
Team-to-AUM ratio0.2 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity69/10066/100
Network strength94/10058/100
Relationships4535
Relationship densityVery highVery high
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity38%
Asset class overlap57%
Geography overlap100%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Border to Coast Pensions Partnership and Australian Retirement Trust?

Border to Coast Pensions Partnership is a public pension fund based in United Kingdom, while Australian Retirement Trust is a public pension fund based in Australia. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Border to Coast Pensions Partnership or Australian Retirement Trust?

By reported AUM, Australian Retirement Trust is larger (GBP 55.4B vs AUD 363.64B).

Border to Coast Pensions Partnership profile →Australian Retirement Trust profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Public Pension Fund firmsFirms in United KingdomMarket intelligenceLatest news