DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Blue Owl Capital vs Stonepeak
← Back to firms

Blue Owl Capital vs Stonepeak

A side-by-side comparison of Blue Owl Capital and Stonepeak across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Blue Owl Capital$319B
Stonepeak$88B
Insight

Blue Owl Capital manages roughly 3.6× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Credit
Left bar: Blue Owl CapitalRight bar: Stonepeak
Insight

Both firms are active in 1 shared asset class out of 1 tracked between them.

Key observations

  • • Blue Owl Capital is the largest by AUM at $319B — 3.63× Stonepeak ($88B).
  • • Stonepeak is the most established (founded 2011), 10 years before Blue Owl Capital (2021).
  • • Blue Owl Capital has the broadest mandate — active across 6 asset classes vs 3 for Stonepeak.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Credit, Real Estate, Infrastructure.
  • • Blue Owl Capital is the only one here in Private Equity & Secondaries, +1 more.
  • • All 2 are headquartered in United States.
  • • Blue Owl Capital's network is more connected (64/100 vs 23/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 17% (Jaccard) — 9 shared: First Lien, Senior Secured, Unitranche and 6 more.
  • • Overall similarity is 26%, driven by 8 shared strategies, 3 shared asset classes, same AUM band.
26%Similarity score8 shared strategies · 3 shared asset classes · same AUM band · same country
Blue Owl CapitalStonepeak
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
Founded20212011
Firm age5 yrs15 yrs
RolesGp, Lender, Public ListingGp
Scale & AUM
AUM$319B$88B
Market positionGiant ($100–500B)Large ($20–100B)
AUM ratio3.6× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies34 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Senior Secured, Unitranche22 — Core, Core-Plus, Value-Add, Opportunistic
Asset classesprivate credit, real estate, infrastructure, private equity, secondaries, venture capitalinfrastructure, real estate, private credit
Shared strategies9: First Lien, Senior Secured, Unitranche
Shared asset classes3: private credit, real estate, infrastructure
Geography
Geographic biasUnited StatesNorth America
RegionsUnited States, United Kingdom, Europe, AsiaNorth America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Global
Shared geographiesEurope, Europe, Europe
Fund Portfolio
Published funds2521
Largest fundBlue Owl GP Stakes VStonepeak Infrastructure Fund IV
Vintage range2015–20262021–2025
Fund statusesClosed (24), Fundraising (1)Fundraising (6), Closed (9), Investing (6)
Performance
Avg. net IRR13.1%—
Avg. TVPI1.52x—
Team
Total contacts3261
Team-to-AUM ratio0.1 per $B0.7 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity64/10023/100
Network strength36/1005/100
Relationships212
Relationship densityHighVery high
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity26%
Strategy overlap17%
Asset class overlap50%
Geography overlap7%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Blue Owl Capital and Stonepeak?

Blue Owl Capital is a asset manager based in United States, while Stonepeak is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Blue Owl Capital or Stonepeak?

By reported AUM, Blue Owl Capital is larger ($319B vs $88B).

Blue Owl Capital profile →Stonepeak profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news