DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Blue Owl Capital vs Pacific Equity Partners
← Back to firms

Blue Owl Capital vs Pacific Equity Partners

A side-by-side comparison of Blue Owl Capital and Pacific Equity Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Blue Owl Capital$319B
Pacific Equity PartnersAUD 17B
Insight

Blue Owl Capital manages roughly 18.8× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Credit
Left bar: Blue Owl CapitalRight bar: Pacific Equity Partners
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Blue Owl Capital is the largest by AUM at $319B — 18.76× Pacific Equity Partners ($17B).
  • • Pacific Equity Partners is the most established (founded 1998), 23 years before Blue Owl Capital (2021).
  • • Blue Owl Capital has the broadest mandate — active across 6 asset classes vs 2 for Pacific Equity Partners.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Credit, Private Equity.
  • • Blue Owl Capital is the only one here in Real Estate & Infrastructure, +2 more.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United States, Australia.
  • • Blue Owl Capital's network is more connected (64/100 vs 0/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 3% (Jaccard) — 1 shared: Senior Secured.
  • • Overall similarity is 15%, driven by 1 shared strategies, 2 shared asset classes, adjacent AUM band.
15%Similarity score1 shared strategies · 2 shared asset classes · adjacent AUM band
Blue Owl CapitalPacific Equity Partners
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesAustralia
Founded20211998
Firm age5 yrs28 yrs
RolesGp, Lender, Public ListingGp
Scale & AUM
AUM$319BAUD 17B
Market positionGiant ($100–500B)Mid ($5–20B)
AUM ratio18.8× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetprivate equity-focused
DiversificationBroadFocused
Strategies34 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Senior Secured, Unitranche4 — Buyout, Buy-and-Build, Public-to-Private, Senior Secured
Asset classesprivate credit, real estate, infrastructure, private equity, secondaries, venture capitalprivate equity, private credit
Shared strategies1: Senior Secured
Shared asset classes2: private credit, private equity
Geography
Geographic biasUnited StatesAustralia
RegionsUnited States, United Kingdom, Europe, AsiaAustralia, New Zealand
Fund Portfolio
Published funds259
Largest fundBlue Owl GP Stakes VPacific Equity Partners Fund VII
Vintage range2015–20262015–2024
Fund statusesClosed (24), Fundraising (1)Closed (1), Investing (2), Harvesting (2), Liquidated (1), Fundraising (3)
Performance
Avg. net IRR13.1%53.0%
Avg. TVPI1.52x—
Team
Total contacts3213
Team-to-AUM ratio0.1 per $B0.8 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity64/1000/100
Network strength36/1000/100
Relationships210
Relationship densityHighHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity15%
Strategy overlap3%
Asset class overlap33%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Blue Owl Capital and Pacific Equity Partners?

Blue Owl Capital is a asset manager based in United States, while Pacific Equity Partners is a asset manager based in Australia. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Blue Owl Capital or Pacific Equity Partners?

By reported AUM, Blue Owl Capital is larger ($319B vs AUD 17B).

Blue Owl Capital profile →Pacific Equity Partners profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news