DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Blue Owl Capital vs InfraVia Capital Partners
← Back to firms

Blue Owl Capital vs InfraVia Capital Partners

A side-by-side comparison of Blue Owl Capital and InfraVia Capital Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Blue Owl Capital$319B
InfraVia Capital PartnersEUR 16B
Insight

Blue Owl Capital manages roughly 19.9× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Credit
Left bar: Blue Owl CapitalRight bar: InfraVia Capital Partners
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Blue Owl Capital is the largest by AUM at $319B — 19.94× InfraVia Capital Partners ($16B).
  • • InfraVia Capital Partners is the most established (founded 2008), 13 years before Blue Owl Capital (2021).
  • • Blue Owl Capital has the broadest mandate — active across 6 asset classes vs 4 for InfraVia Capital Partners.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Real Estate, Infrastructure, Private Equity.
  • • Blue Owl Capital is the only one here in Private Credit & Secondaries, +1 more.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United States, France.
  • • Blue Owl Capital's network is more connected (64/100 vs 23/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Overall similarity is 19%, driven by 3 shared asset classes, adjacent AUM band.
19%Similarity score3 shared asset classes · adjacent AUM band
Blue Owl CapitalInfraVia Capital Partners
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesFrance
Founded20212008
Firm age5 yrs18 yrs
RolesGp, Lender, Public ListingGp
Scale & AUM
AUM$319BEUR 16B
Market positionGiant ($100–500B)Mid ($5–20B)
AUM ratio19.9× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadModerate
Strategies34 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Senior Secured, Unitranche8 — Value-Add, Energy / Power, Social Infrastructure, Transport
Asset classesprivate credit, real estate, infrastructure, private equity, secondaries, venture capitalinfrastructure, private equity, real estate, other
Shared asset classes3: real estate, infrastructure, private equity
Geography
Geographic biasUnited StatesEurope
RegionsUnited States, United Kingdom, Europe, AsiaEurope, Europe, France, France
Shared geographiesEurope, Europe, Europe
Fund Portfolio
Published funds258
Largest fundBlue Owl GP Stakes VInfraVia European Fund VI
Vintage range2015–20262014–2018
Fund statusesClosed (24), Fundraising (1)Closed (6), Investing (2)
Performance
Avg. net IRR13.1%—
Avg. TVPI1.52x—
Team
Total contacts3238
Team-to-AUM ratio0.1 per $B2.4 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity64/10023/100
Network strength36/1001/100
Relationships212
Relationship densityHighVery high
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity19%
Asset class overlap43%
Geography overlap18%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Blue Owl Capital and InfraVia Capital Partners?

Blue Owl Capital is a asset manager based in United States, while InfraVia Capital Partners is a asset manager based in France. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Blue Owl Capital or InfraVia Capital Partners?

By reported AUM, Blue Owl Capital is larger ($319B vs EUR 16B).

Blue Owl Capital profile →InfraVia Capital Partners profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news