A side-by-side comparison of Blackstone and KKR across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Blackstone manages roughly 2.0× the assets of the other firm.
Both firms are active in 3 shared asset classes out of 4 tracked between them.
| Blackstone | KKR | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1985 | 1976 |
| Firm age | 41 yrs | 50 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $1.3T | $640B |
| Market position | Mega ($500B+) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 2.0× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Diversified |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure | private credit, real estate, infrastructure, private equity |
| Shared asset classes | 4: private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | North America |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, India | North America, Europe, Asia, North America |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, Asia | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 5 | 0 |
| Largest fund | Blackstone Capital Partners IX (BCP IX) | — |
| Vintage range | 2023–2026 | — |
| Fund statuses | Fundraising (4), Closed (1) | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 16 | 12 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 60/100 | 52/100 |
| Network strength | 48/100 | 22/100 |
| Relationships | 22 | 11 |
| Relationship density | High | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 39% | |
| Asset class overlap | 80% | |
| Geography overlap | 50% | |
Blackstone is a asset manager based in United States, while KKR is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Blackstone is larger ($1.3T vs $640B).