A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock and Aegon Asset Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
| BlackRock | Aegon Asset Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | Netherlands |
| Founded | 1988 | 1983 |
| Firm age | 38 yrs | 43 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $13.89T | $287.5B |
| Market position | Mega ($500B+) | Giant ($100–500B) |
| AUM ratio | 48.3× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Diversified | Broad |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure | private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income |
| Shared asset classes | 4: private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Europe | Europe |
| Regions | North America, South America, Europe, Asia | Europe, Global, North America, Europe |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, North America | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 25 | 0 |
| Largest fund | Global Infrastructure Partners Fund V | — |
| Vintage range | 2020–2025 | — |
| Fund statuses | Fundraising (10), Closed (15) | — |
| Deal size preference | Large-cap | Not available |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 3 | 2 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Network strength | 63/100 | 17/100 |
| Relationships | 53 | 14 |
| Relationship density | Very high | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 30% | |
| Asset class overlap | 80% | |
| Geography overlap | 20% | |
BlackRock is a asset manager based in United States, while Aegon Asset Management is a asset manager based in Netherlands. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, BlackRock is larger ($13.89T vs $287.5B).