DataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Apollo Global Management vs Lone Pine Capital
← Back to firms

Apollo Global Management vs Lone Pine Capital

A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management and Lone Pine Capital across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Apollo Global Management$750B
Lone Pine Capital$19B
Insight

Apollo Global Management manages roughly 39.5× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Private Credit
Real Estate
Left bar: Apollo Global ManagementRight bar: Lone Pine Capital
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Apollo Global Management is the largest by AUM at $750B — 39.47× Lone Pine Capital ($19B).
  • • Apollo Global Management is the most established (founded 1990), 7 years before Lone Pine Capital (1997).
  • • Apollo Global Management has the broadest mandate — active across 3 asset classes vs 2 for Lone Pine Capital.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity.
  • • Apollo Global Management is the only one here in Private Credit & Real Estate.
  • • All 2 are headquartered in United States.
  • • Apollo Global Management's network is more connected (41/100 vs 31/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Overall similarity is 11%, driven by 1 shared asset classes, same country.
11%Similarity score1 shared asset classes · same country
Apollo Global ManagementLone Pine Capital
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
Founded19901997
Firm age36 yrs29 yrs
RolesGpGp, Advisor
Scale & AUM
AUM$750B$19B
Market positionMega ($500B+)Mid ($5–20B)
AUM ratio39.5× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetprivate equity-focused
DiversificationDiversifiedModerate
Asset classesprivate equity, private credit, real estateprivate equity, hedge funds
Shared asset classes1: private equity
Geography
Geographic biasNorth AmericaNorth America
RegionsNorth America, Europe, Asia, IndiaNorth America, Europe, Global, North America
Shared geographiesNorth America, Europe, North America
Fund Portfolio
Published funds01
Largest fund—Lone Mountain Pine Strategy
Vintage range—2025
Fund statuses—Investing (1)
Team
Total contacts108
Team-to-AUM ratio0.0 per $B0.4 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity41/10031/100
Network strength13/1003/100
Relationships65
Relationship densityModerateModerate
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity11%
Asset class overlap25%
Geography overlap13%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Apollo Global Management and Lone Pine Capital?

Apollo Global Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Lone Pine Capital is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Apollo Global Management or Lone Pine Capital?

By reported AUM, Apollo Global Management is larger ($750B vs $19B).

Apollo Global Management profile →Lone Pine Capital profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news